Saturday, August 30, 2008

Twilight

After hearing so many people rave about it, I finally read Twlilight by Stephenie Meyer. I believe I am about to express an unpopular opinion: I think Twilight is rather drivelly. I know everyone loves the Twilight series; I can definitely see the appeal to teenage girls. But I don't understand why so many grown-up women are so excited by it. I found the book disappointing.

To be sure you understand me, I'll say that Ms. Meyer writes well enough to keep me wanting to read more; I was interested enough to finish the book—and even finish it in one day. I kind of enjoyed it—except that I was unable to completely suspend my disbelief. In plain English: I found it less believable than your average story about a vampire and a normal, human girl falling in love. But as I thought about the characters and situation after I finished reading it, I became even more dissatisfied.

I really couldn't see why Edward would fall in love with Bella; she was kind of a whiny teenager. Yes, they say that she is grown-up for her age; but you know . . . Edward, although he appears to be seventeen, is over 100 years old. I'm only 41 and, even though teenagers are nice enough, I can't imagine falling in love with one now. Our life experiences are too completely different; we don't see things in the same way at all. I don't even see things in the same way that I saw them as a teenager. But factor in the idea that Edward, besides being a century older, is also a vampire—their life experiences are completely, totally, vastly different. As far as I can tell, he is simply intrigued by this pretty girl whose mind he is unable to read. Edward even tells us (through Bella) that he is unfamiliar with and unable to understand human emotions. Why would he fall in love with her?

As for Bella, all I could see on her side is that Edward is the most unbelievably gorgeous boy she (or anyone else in the world) has ever seen: He wasn't nice to her; in fact at first he seems to be repelled by her—maybe even hate her—with no provocation on her part. Granted, he did save her from a tragic car accident; but she can't figure out why he saved her since he so obviously dislikes her (which is, in itself, weird. Why wouldn't anyone step in to save her, if they could?). Bella gives us no reason that she would fall in love with him except that he's soooo gorgeous. It seems more a matter of lust than love to me.

OK. So much for credibility. How about content?

I'd have to say that a good thirty percent of this book is spent by Bella telling us how totally gorgeous Edward is, from his perfect, rock-hard figure to his amazing smile and melt-you-into-a-puddle voice. I think I really understood that after the first few tellings. Another ten percent of the book is spent by her saying that she's going to be in love with him no matter what he does to discourage her (which is, basically, him saying, "You shouldn't like me."). And another ten percent is Edward telling her that it's really a bad idea for her to fall in love with him. * bored sigh *

Besides all that, they all take themselves sooooo seriously. It's like, "I love you, dang-it. And this is serious stuff!" She did attempt to lighten it up a little bit with a vampire baseball game, but that event was quickly broken up by the evil, bad-guy vampire. Oh well.

However, I admit, I did read it all the way through to the happy ending. And I cared about it enough to find out what will happen next. I asked Michael, who's read through the third book, and that's enough for me.

My overall rating? I'd have to agree with a (40-year old, married, male) friend of ours, who said: "Those Twilight books really bring out the twelve-year-old girl in all of us."

9 comments:

Rebecca Whitcomb North said...

I cared enough about the story and characters to keep reading through the entire series. I did like the fact that Stephanie Meyer could draw her readers into her books and keep them there. Once I would get into the books it was hard for me to put them down. I did not become obsessed with Edward, though, as many other women/girls have. In fact, in some of the books I actually ended up disliking Edward, because he seemed too controlling towards Bella, and I couldn't help but feel that he was not right for her. Some parts of the books were too drawn out as well, especially the love scenes. They kind of get worse as they go along.

I believe I would have enjoyed reading the books more as a teenager than as a married adult. The stories would have been a lot more believable to me at a younger age. But I still had a great time reading them as an 28-year-old woman, too. The books were fun and entertaining, and very original, which I like in stories. It was a fun way to escape.

Ben and Tami said...

Wow, I thought some of the same things as you. I didn't like Edward and really didn't want Bella to end up with her. I fully agree with the word you used. Their relationship seemed very lustful. Nothing was ever mentioned that would have given their relationship depth.

I laughed over the life experiences point. I'm in Young Womens now and time sure changes things. I wouldn't last long in a relationship with a teenager.

Since you explained away 50% percent of the book, I wonder how entertaining the movie will be. I have seen the trailer for it and they've picked the wrong actor to play Edward.

Loralee said...

I do wonder if this would make a better book than movie. But I guess the "Edward" actor isn't gorgeous enough?

As for escaping into the books, I guess that was a lot of my problem. I couldn't believe it enough to really escape. Maybe I've just become too cynical in my old age. ;-)

Anonymous said...

I thought this story was more about eacaping into the fun of first love--or first infactuation, as the case may be.
You made it sound like Meyer wrote in a boring way--but from what I gather, she's hit on everything that makes a guy attractive: he's strong & quick. He pays attention to Bella, talks with her, saves her from accidents and bad guys, and spends time with her. All his actions say he likes her, and it's hard not to love someone who is loving you. And the "down" side of being a vampire? Of not being "right" for each other, that they could never get together because she's only human, that she could never understand what things are like for him? How many times have we seen a story where the more mysterious, dangerous and distant a guy is, the more she wants to be near him, risk being with him, learn his mysteries? It's human nature: you don't want it 'till you're told you can't have it. Then you gotta have it.
I'm not saying the story must therefore be appealing--part of the pleasure of a book is just clicking with the author--and that can be hit and miss. In any case, it's fun to escape into a light love story.
And I'm sure it doesn't hurt if the guy is drop-dead gorgeous in a turtleneck.

Loralee said...

OK. That's hardly fair! Bruce is commenting on this book that he hasn't even read.

Yes, yes, all Bruce says is true: we all want a hero who's strong & quick, pays attention to us, talks with us, saves the day for us, and spends time with us. That is appealing. But I still don't really understand what got Edward and Bella together in the first place.

I don't think that Ms. Meyer wrote in a boring way; I did read the whole book--in one day! It's just that she repeated a lot of the same stuff over and over and over. And over again. And most of it was about Edward's physical appearance.

I will maintain that I can see the appeal to teenage girls. I would have liked Twlilight a lot better myself twenty years ago.

And no, Bruce, it doesn't hurt if the hero drop-dead gorgeous in a turtleneck. Particularly a sexy black one! ;-)

Anonymous said...

Okay, I'm good with that.
But what I want to know is, how do I look in a turtleneck?

Anonymous said...

So Loralee and I have been discussing how important physical appearance is to attraction and love. It seems that in our society, looking good is only for when you're in the market. Then, once you're married, it doesn't really matter.
But it's still important! It's fun for me to dress up & look sharp for her, and I looove for her to doll up for me. I still love to look at Loralee. Dang, she can look mighty hot when she wants to!
And she's not even a teenager :)

Loralee said...

This has somehow turned into a personal forum, and it's gotten way off of the original topic, which was the book, Twilight.
So, Bruce, if you want to continue discussing the merits of physical attraction within marriage, I'll get with you later tonight!

Stephanie said...

I love the commentary going on between you and Bruce!! I see where you're coming from, and I agree with you, in a way. I can see what attracts Edward to Bella also. He is intrigued by her at first, because he isn't able to read her mind; that is what first gets him to pay attention to her. Stephenie Meyer is working on another book, 'Midnight Sun' which is Twilight from Edwards perspective instead of Bella's. If you are at all interested, you can read the first chapter of it on Meyer's website (stepheniemeyer.com). It gives you a better understanding of what attracts him to her and makes it a little more believable. Sorry that was so long.

Anyway, all of that being said, I did get tired of Bella always saying how gorgeous Edward is and how whiny she was about everything.